Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Longleaf Partners Q1 2010 Letter

The investment case for the Longleaf Funds overpowers macro concerns for several reasons:


• These macro predictions appear adequately discounted. We submit that they are baked into prices because so many investors share the same concerns. The magnitude of 2008 stock market declines was extremely anomalous, especially compared to previous bear markets associated with severe economic downturns, wars, or double-digit inflation. Prices reacted far more negatively than the recession’s meaningful impact on companies.

• We are not oblivious, however, to potential negative macro scenarios as evidenced by our investments. Core holdings such as DIRECTV, tw telecom, Yum, Fairfax, and Genting were “battle tested” in the first leg of the recession and demonstrated their ability to hold up if recession recurs. The majority of our companies have pricing power which would protect them in an inflationary scenario, and many would be net beneficiaries of inflation.


• The dread scenarios could actually help some of our holdings. For example, if governments continue to intervene heavily with infrastructure spending, Cemex, Texas Industries, ACS, and Hochtief will benefit. If the U.S. government gets serious about energy policy and its relationship to national security, Chesapeake’s natural gas and Pioneer’s domestic oil will gain additional advantage.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

IVA Funds

We like the flexibility to invest in small, medium, and large companies, depending on where we see value.


We are willing to hold cash when we cannot find enough cheap securities that we like or when we find some, yet the broader market (Mr. Market) seems fully priced. We will seek to use that cash as ammunition for future bargains. 


In this environment, we try not to forecast but focus on valuation as well as risks. We are fond of Peter Bernstein's statement, "Risk is the only thing you can manage. You can't make your returns happen, but you can manage the degree to which your portfolio is exposed to to damage if things go wrong."


Being optimistic or pessimistic all depends on the price. 


The bursting of a credit-induced bubble is deflationary by nature, but may ultimately lead to inflation, depending on the policy makers’ response. We believe short term,that the deflationary forces are stronger than commonly perceived but remain agnostic longer term. The Funds’ portfolios, whilst built to a large extent from the bottom up, currently reflect that view, Both Funds have a high cash component which we believe is good under both short and long-term scenarios: a deflationary period means that cash has more purchasing power while an inflationary period would ultimately allow us to buy equities that could dc-rate (as they did in the 1970’s). The Funds both hold some gold, which did so well during the inflationary 1970’s but also during the deflationary 1930’s, The Funds both hold some high yield bonds, which we believe are of high quality (important if deflation spreads) yet not too long (important if inflation came back in a few years). Finally, both Funds have a moderate allocation to equities, with an emphasis on strong balance sheets, good competitive positions, decent pricing power (a huge advantage either during deflation or inflation) and not overly capital intensive business models (good under inflation)*.

*Understands the consequences of a macro-economic outcome on an investment.


We are particularly intrigued when credit markets, or segments of it, become disconnected from equity markets. Credit markets, filled with investors that worry about what can go wrong, do a better job at assessing risk than the equity market—filled with investors (or speculators) that, at times, fantasize mostly about the upside potential. During the spring and summer of 2008, we were intrigued by the credit markets, which were deteriorating faster than the U.S. equity market. The Lehman bankruptcy came along and the U.S. equity market finally capitulated. lnterestingly enough, the credit markets held up rather well in February 2009 while bank stocks were under severe attack. The huge rally since March appears to indicate that the credit markets were right again to be stabilizing while the broad equity indices were still declining lower. Over the past few months, however, we believe there may be a disconnect between the U.S. Treasury market—signaling slow economic growth and modest inflation for years to come—and both the high yield market (with lower spreads) and global equity markets — signaling a long-lasting V-shaped recovery.