Longleaf Partners Q1 2010 Letter

The investment case for the Longleaf Funds overpowers macro concerns for several reasons:


• These macro predictions appear adequately discounted. We submit that they are baked into prices because so many investors share the same concerns. The magnitude of 2008 stock market declines was extremely anomalous, especially compared to previous bear markets associated with severe economic downturns, wars, or double-digit inflation. Prices reacted far more negatively than the recession’s meaningful impact on companies.

• We are not oblivious, however, to potential negative macro scenarios as evidenced by our investments. Core holdings such as DIRECTV, tw telecom, Yum, Fairfax, and Genting were “battle tested” in the first leg of the recession and demonstrated their ability to hold up if recession recurs. The majority of our companies have pricing power which would protect them in an inflationary scenario, and many would be net beneficiaries of inflation.


• The dread scenarios could actually help some of our holdings. For example, if governments continue to intervene heavily with infrastructure spending, Cemex, Texas Industries, ACS, and Hochtief will benefit. If the U.S. government gets serious about energy policy and its relationship to national security, Chesapeake’s natural gas and Pioneer’s domestic oil will gain additional advantage.